gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
681571 Posts in 27644 Topics by 4082 Members - Latest Member: briansclub June 16, 2024, 11:22:26 AM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: What kind of material should the band have released instead of "15 Big Ones"?  (Read 5123 times)
Quzi
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 909


Eagerly awaiting tHe BeDRoOM TaPES


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: August 18, 2013, 11:05:07 PM »


Some very interesting scattered musings, however, I have a different take on Dennis not being the savior in the early 70's.  There was a brief flash where it was happening, and ironically you can see it in The Mike Douglas Show footage, where they perform "Never Learn Not To Love"  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8I0v2bVX8j4.  I say it’s ironic because to my memory, it was the trial, the threats & the aftermath of his involvement with Manson which caused control to slip through his fingers.  You can see in that footage, (& perhaps even more so in that damn missing David Frost Show!), how there was no stopping his stepping to the forefront at a certain point. I mean, nobody questions that practically from the gate, he was absolutely the most charismatic part of their show.

Which is not to say he ever for a moment thought he could be the showman that Mike was, and he became all the more aware of that once he injured his hand, and was forced out front with Mike. I really believe his discomfort in that role contributed a great deal to his drinking. Also, as far as setting his sights on his solo career, he wasn’t any different than Mike & Brian releasing a single, or Brian putting out “Caroline No” as a solo. While there were examples of him pulling tracks, for the most part his material was as available to The Beach Boys as Lindsey Buckingham’s works in progress are often adopted by Fleetwood Mac. 


I also subscribe to the theory that his discomfort as a frontman and the Manson incidents stopped him becoming a "Mike" for the band in the late 60s. In my above post I was mainly speculating as to why Dennis didn't "save" the band in a songwriting capacity from '74-'76 (which I still think that ultimately boils down to his respect for Brian and solo aspirations.)

The way I see it is Dennis contributed 25% of the material on 20/20 and Sunflower, a pretty fair claim in a band with so many songwriters. Even with this quantifiable stake of control in the band at the time, Dennis still had a drive to do things alone, evident by the release of "Sound of Free" in 1970 and his attempt a solo album in '71/'72.  It gives a little less credence to the theory that Dennis was only attracted to a solo career in '76 after being forced to because of band politics - it'd been on the guy's mind for a while.
Logged

"A/S/L"?
"Age:24. That's when Brian Wilson made Pet Sounds. Sex: Brian Wilson was having loads of sex with Marilyn when he made Pet Sounds. Location: Gold Star Studios, where Brian Wilson assembled with the Wrecking Crew to make Pet Sounds. Hbu?"
Nicko1234
Guest
« Reply #26 on: August 18, 2013, 11:48:07 PM »


...This is that goofy-and-weird definition of "Brian Wilson-sounding", which excludes basically all his hugely successful albums before 1967, is it?  :-)

The reason I'm not keen on the stuff round that time is because it sounds like Brian malfunctioning, in a way which none of the previous albums -- even quirky ones like "Friends" -- do.  Even "Smiley Smile", which sounds like they're all off the planet, doesn't sound like he's flailing for something and not reaching it.

Cheers,
Jon Blum

I agree as well. I think it's apparent from all the reports at the time that Brian didn't want to be producing this album and it shows with the lackluster arrangements, productions and mixes.
Logged
Jay
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Posts: 5992



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: August 19, 2013, 01:41:10 AM »

I used to be appalled by 15 Big Ones. Couldn't believe what a drop-off from their earlier material it was. But I actually came to really like it. It has so many touches that are just so obviously "Brian", which one couldn't say about a great deal of the few albums before it.

But regardless, when the group released this album, they were riding a wave of popularity that they hadn't since the 1960s and no doubt, they squandered it. While 15 Big Ones is fun and raw and goofy and hoarse, that was not what the public wanted. Shoot, I'm not sure any of group themselves (besides Brian) even wanted that. What could they realistically have done at this point to capitalize on the success of Endless Summer? Well one would think they'd let every member submit their best material and just fashion a cohesive album out of that (and add a few covers since Brian was definitely diggin' those at the time). And with the following tunes (all of which were likely at least considered for the album), it seems they really could have had a commercial and critical hit. And who knows what that woulda meant!

"Good Timin'"
"California Feelin'"
"It's OK"
"Ding Dang"
"River Song"
"Everyone's In Love With You"
"Susie Cincinnati"
"Angel Come Home"
"Just Once In My Life"
"Palisades Park"

There you go. Ten songs. Not amazing, but definitely a good collection with a few songs that eventually became hit singles ("Good Timin'" and "It's OK"). Shame they didn't put something like this out.
Take out Palisades Park and possibly Ding Dang, replace them with Go And Get That Girl and Sherry, She Needs Me, and you've got a great album.  Cool
Logged

A son of anarchy surrounded by the hierarchy.
phirnis
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2594



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: August 19, 2013, 03:06:04 AM »


...This is that goofy-and-weird definition of "Brian Wilson-sounding", which excludes basically all his hugely successful albums before 1967, is it?  :-)

The reason I'm not keen on the stuff round that time is because it sounds like Brian malfunctioning, in a way which none of the previous albums -- even quirky ones like "Friends" -- do.  Even "Smiley Smile", which sounds like they're all off the planet, doesn't sound like he's flailing for something and not reaching it.

Cheers,
Jon Blum

I agree as well. I think it's apparent from all the reports at the time that Brian didn't want to be producing this album and it shows with the lackluster arrangements, productions and mixes.

He called it his favorite BB album as recently as 2012 so there must be something about it that he really likes. Being back in the spotlight made him nervous perhaps but the backing tracks he produced for this album sound like he was quite into it.
Logged
Gabo
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1162



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: August 19, 2013, 08:26:36 PM »

music that sounded like their 1963-1966 heyday i guess... too bad that was impossible by 1976
« Last Edit: August 19, 2013, 08:30:43 PM by Gabo » Logged
Magic Transistor Radio
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2974


Bill Cooper Mystery Babylon


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: August 19, 2013, 09:07:17 PM »

I am very disturbed by 15 Big Ones, but quite charmed by Love You. The Adult/Child material is somewhere in between. 

To me, Love You captures the magic of Smiley Smile/Wild Honey/Friends era. Music that sounds half assed, but very creative at the same time. 15 Big One's doesn't do anything for me. Although, I would be interested in hearing the backing tracks.
Logged

"Over the years, I've been accused of not supporting our new music from this era (67-73) and just wanting to play our hits. That's complete b.s......I was also, as the front man, the one promoting these songs onstage and have the scars to show for it."
Mike Love autobiography (pg 242-243)
Mujan, 8@$+@Rc| of a Blue Wizard
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1565


SMiLE is America: Infinite Potential Never Reached


View Profile WWW
« Reply #31 on: March 25, 2014, 07:16:53 PM »


...This is that goofy-and-weird definition of "Brian Wilson-sounding", which excludes basically all his hugely successful albums before 1967, is it?  :-)

The reason I'm not keen on the stuff round that time is because it sounds like Brian malfunctioning, in a way which none of the previous albums -- even quirky ones like "Friends" -- do.  Even "Smiley Smile", which sounds like they're all off the planet, doesn't sound like he's flailing for something and not reaching it.

Cheers,
Jon Blum

I agree as well. I think it's apparent from all the reports at the time that Brian didn't want to be producing this album and it shows with the lackluster arrangements, productions and mixes.

He called it his favorite BB album as recently as 2012 so there must be something about it that he really likes. Being back in the spotlight made him nervous perhaps but the backing tracks he produced for this album sound like he was quite into it.

Source? Not that I think you're lying, but I recall reading somewhere that he considered Summer Days (And Summer Nights!!) his favorite. Perhaps he changed his mind, I guess.
Logged

Here are my SMiLE Mixes. All are 2 suite, but still vastly different in several ways. Be on the lookout for another, someday.

Aquarian SMiLE>HERE
Dumb Angel (Olorin Edition)>HERE
Dumb Angel [the Romestamo Cut]>HERE

& This is a new pet project Ive worked on, which combines Fritz Lang's classic film, Metropolis (1927) with The United States of America (1968) as a new soundtrack. More info is in the video description.
The American Metropolitan Circus>HERE
[
alf wiedersehen
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2178


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: March 25, 2014, 07:27:02 PM »

Every Beach Boys album has been Brian's favorite at some point.
Logged
Jim V.
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Posts: 3043



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: March 25, 2014, 08:30:23 PM »

Every Beach Boys album has been Brian's favorite at some point.

I'm not sure about every album, but I'm pretty sure at some point he was even saying Carl and the Passions and Holland were two of his favorites, surprisingly.
Logged
halblaineisgood
Guest
« Reply #34 on: March 25, 2014, 08:34:07 PM »

.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2014, 10:09:34 PM by halblaineisgood » Logged
halblaineisgood
Guest
« Reply #35 on: March 25, 2014, 09:29:01 PM »

.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2014, 10:09:45 PM by halblaineisgood » Logged
shelter
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2201


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: March 26, 2014, 12:00:39 AM »

I love the double album idea. If 15 is some sort of crazy mess, imagine what a spectacularly crazy mess a crushing dose of it would've been!

It could have been a cool double album if it would've had only originals on one disc and only covers on the other.
Logged
bgas
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6372


Oh for the good old days


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: March 26, 2014, 05:57:03 AM »

I love the double album idea. If 15 is some sort of crazy mess, imagine what a spectacularly crazy mess a crushing dose of it would've been!

It could have been a cool double album if it would've had only originals on one disc and only covers on the other.

Hmmm...   It's Deja Vu all over again
Logged

Nothing I post is my opinion, it's all a message from God
JK
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6053


Maybe I put too much faith in atmosphere


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: March 26, 2014, 07:47:31 AM »

It could have made a stunning single----"It's O.K." b/w "just Once In My Life".
Logged

"Ik bun moar een eenvoudige boerenlul en doar schoam ik mien niet veur" (Normaal, 1978)
You're Grass and I'm a Power Mower: A Beach Boys Orchestration Web Series
the Carbon Freeze | Eclectic Essays & Art
gfx
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.359 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!