gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
683241 Posts in 27763 Topics by 4096 Members - Latest Member: MrSunshine July 26, 2025, 05:45:55 AM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Sloop John B - Did it belong on Pet Sounds?  (Read 12677 times)
ThyRavenAscend
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 397


It is nice.


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: September 09, 2013, 06:33:24 AM »

I would remove Wouldn't It Be Nice.  It is too screamingly bright.

 


 Shocked
Yes let's remove one of the greatest opening tracks in rock history, thank you.

That was my reaction, times 500. WIBN is my all-time favorite song.

Likewise--in fact, I'd be tempted to trade in every other song on Pet Sounds for WIBN.
Logged

1 Corinthians 1:18-31
filledeplage
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 3151


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: September 09, 2013, 07:29:09 AM »

I would remove Wouldn't It Be Nice.  It is too screamingly bright.


 Shocked
Yes let's remove one of the greatest opening tracks in rock history, thank you.

That was my reaction, times 500. WIBN is my all-time favorite song.

Likewise--in fact, I'd be tempted to trade in every other song on Pet Sounds for WIBN.
WIBN is like the preface to a great book.  It keeps you turning the pages for more!

It ushers in the work with a bang!  Wink
Logged
Shady
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6484


I had to fix a lot of things this morning


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: September 09, 2013, 07:32:31 AM »

I can't imagine Pet Sounds without it
Logged

According to someone who would know.

Seriously, there was a Beach Boys Love You condom?!  Amazing.
Christoph
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 107



View Profile WWW
« Reply #28 on: September 09, 2013, 07:38:39 AM »

It sure does fit on PS. Since it follows Lets go away for a while, I imagine it as some kind of regression into childhood, since it can be seen as some kind of children song (my grandfather and me). So maybe we can argue Brian wanted to get away from the pressure of growing up for a while and just be a kid again?
Logged

filledeplage
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 3151


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: September 09, 2013, 11:06:20 AM »

It sure does fit on PS. Since it follows Lets go away for a while, I imagine it as some kind of regression into childhood, since it can be seen as some kind of children song (my grandfather and me). So maybe we can argue Brian wanted to get away from the pressure of growing up for a while and just be a kid again?
Check out some YouTubes of the Kingston Trio doing Sloop John B. 

Drinkin' with "grandfather" - sounds kinda funny!  Beer

Maybe an older grandchild?

Love Brian's arrangement, but it was in the pubic domain as an old folk tune and recorded by many, according to wiki.

Logged
chrs_mrgn
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 422



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: September 09, 2013, 04:04:34 PM »

I think it is a cover that Al wanted to do. It slipped its way onto the album without much thought as to how it fits into  the 'narrative' of the album as a whole.
Logged
sockittome
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 842


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: September 09, 2013, 04:31:22 PM »

*sigh*  Every time a thread like this is started, a tape in the BBs vault turns to dust..... Sad
Logged
Waspinators
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 87


Keep it Clean with Al Jardine


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: September 09, 2013, 10:01:23 PM »

*sigh*  Every time a thread like this is started, a tape in the BBs vault turns to dust..... Sad

Hell, I haven't been here as long as some so I apologize if this is the 500th thread about it, just wanted to hear other folks' opinions and couldn't find anything too quick through the search. Beats starting another M&B vs. BAD thread by a bit though, no?
Logged
rn57
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 920


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: September 09, 2013, 10:45:50 PM »

In '72, reviewing PS in its incarnation as part of the initial CATP release, Stephen Davis wrote in Rolling Stone that "Sloop John B" was a "boring cover" and speculated that Capitol had chosen it as the leadoff 45 because it was the track "that fit most closely preconceived notions of the band's 'formula'." Me, I think it works beautifully on the album and belongs there.
Logged
JK
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6079


Maybe I put too much faith in atmosphere


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: September 10, 2013, 01:15:53 AM »

I quote AGD at my peril:

Mid-February 1966, Brian handed Capitol a preliminary track list for Pet Sounds, which included a track (as yet unrecorded) called "Good, Good, Good Vibrations"... and "Sloop John B", by then recorded but not released until March. Therefore...

it was not included because it was the current hit...

it was not included at the company's insistance.


[Source]
Logged

"Ik bun moar een eenvoudige boerenlul en doar schoam ik mien niet veur" (Normaal, 1978)
You're Grass and I'm a Power Mower: A Beach Boys Orchestration Web Series
the Carbon Freeze | Eclectic Essays & Art
Smile4ever
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 196


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: September 10, 2013, 09:10:31 PM »

I've heard from so many folks (including ol' Bruce) that Sloop John B sticks out like a sore thumb on Pet Sounds and nearly kills the flow of the album. Many of these people state that it would've fit much better on Summer Days, and some even note that TLGIOK would've been a better fit to close side 1. Personally I think that's absolute poppycock. Though it is a cover, I think Sloop fits like a glove on PS and is the perfect closer to the first side. It's lush, melancholy and nostalgic in a similar manner to That's Not Me or even Caroline, No to a degree. It would've been downright jarring to include on SDSM in my opinion, as would the bouncy TLGIOK on PS. The way it builds up in momentum until the fade-out into the end of the side has always been a bit of a highlight on the LP for me, not to mention the meticulous instrumentation characteristic of the record.

I wasn't able to find a topic dedicated to this debate, so I'd love to hear what you all think.

I love Sloop John B on Pet Sounds. I think it blends beautifully from a music standpoint. Obviously the lyrical theme doesn't fit with the supposed "theme" of PS, which is ambiguous anyway. But honestly, does it really matter? This kind of thing is all about feel and I think words in pop music are overrated (and I say that as a professional wordsmith). Sloop John B fits well and I'm glad it's on the album.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2013, 09:16:36 PM by Smile4ever » Logged
Iron Horse-Apples
Guest
« Reply #36 on: September 11, 2013, 12:09:16 AM »

There was no planned theme to Pet Sounds.

Brian always intended Sloop to be on there.

The Beach Boys is all about music, not words. Sloop fits perfectly.

If you need narrative, read a book!
Logged
Loaf
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 839


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: September 11, 2013, 01:45:29 AM »

I can't imagine Pet Sounds without it

That's it for me too. It's there, it's a great song, it fits sonically, the boys sound great vocally. You can take it to be a children's song or a drugtaking metaphor, which is very zeitgeisty.

There's not one reason to take it off, imo.
Logged
T2458
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 18



View Profile
« Reply #38 on: September 11, 2013, 04:16:35 AM »

I absolutely adore SJB but it always spoils my enjoyment of PS.  It's a cover with completely archaic lyrics and is out of place in my opinion.

If there had to be an orphaned single then better SJB than TLGIOK but obviously time had moved on and that could have felt just as out of place on PS.  If only GV could have been included - but it wasn't.

My own preference is to leave SJB in the running order but as the backing track from the Sessions box set.  Obviously PS then has too many instrumentals but it sounds great to me.

Another alternative that keeps PS with SJB is to just listen to my own version of Remember the Poo.  It's got all the PS tracks but with SJB (backing track only) along with the Asher GV and bonus track TLGIOK (bonus tracks are essential these days).

Given the reasons for whether SJB, LGIOK or GV should have been on PS an equally valid question is "Should Good Vibrations have been left off Smiley Smile in favour of George Fell Into His French Horn?"
Logged
Iron Horse-Apples
Guest
« Reply #39 on: September 11, 2013, 04:34:12 AM »

I absolutely adore SJB but it always spoils my enjoyment of PS.  It's a cover with completely archaic lyrics and is out of place in my opinion.

If there had to be an orphaned single then better SJB than TLGIOK but obviously time had moved on and that could have felt just as out of place on PS.  If only GV could have been included - but it wasn't.

My own preference is to leave SJB in the running order but as the backing track from the Sessions box set.  Obviously PS then has too many instrumentals but it sounds great to me.

Another alternative that keeps PS with SJB is to just listen to my own version of Remember the Poo.  It's got all the PS tracks but with SJB (backing track only) along with the Asher GV and bonus track TLGIOK (bonus tracks are essential these days).

Given the reasons for whether SJB, LGIOK or GV should have been on PS an equally valid question is "Should Good Vibrations have been left off Smiley Smile in favour of George Fell Into His French Horn?"

Remember the Poo?

 LOL
Logged
bonnevillemariner
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 488



View Profile
« Reply #40 on: September 11, 2013, 07:04:01 AM »

Pet Sounds for me has always been about the sound, not the lyrics or theme.  SLB fits perfectly.  Incidentally my least favorite track on Pet Sounds is Pet Sounds.
Logged
filledeplage
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 3151


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: September 11, 2013, 07:54:26 AM »

I absolutely adore SJB but it always spoils my enjoyment of PS.  It's a cover with completely archaic lyrics and is out of place in my opinion.

If there had to be an orphaned single then better SJB than TLGIOK but obviously time had moved on and that could have felt just as out of place on PS.  If only GV could have been included - but it wasn't.

My own preference is to leave SJB in the running order but as the backing track from the Sessions box set.  Obviously PS then has too many instrumentals but it sounds great to me.

Another alternative that keeps PS with SJB is to just listen to my own version of Remember the Poo.  It's got all the PS tracks but with SJB (backing track only) along with the Asher GV and bonus track TLGIOK (bonus tracks are essential these days).

Given the reasons for whether SJB, LGIOK or GV should have been on PS an equally valid question is "Should Good Vibrations have been left off Smiley Smile in favour of George Fell Into His French Horn?"
Sloop and it's "archaic" lyrics sort of tie into the SMiLE genre, as part of the American Experience. 
Logged
Loaf
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 839


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: September 11, 2013, 08:11:56 AM »

I absolutely adore SJB but it always spoils my enjoyment of PS.  It's a cover with completely archaic lyrics and is out of place in my opinion.

If there had to be an orphaned single then better SJB than TLGIOK but obviously time had moved on and that could have felt just as out of place on PS.  If only GV could have been included - but it wasn't.

My own preference is to leave SJB in the running order but as the backing track from the Sessions box set.  Obviously PS then has too many instrumentals but it sounds great to me.

Another alternative that keeps PS with SJB is to just listen to my own version of Remember the Poo.  It's got all the PS tracks but with SJB (backing track only) along with the Asher GV and bonus track TLGIOK (bonus tracks are essential these days).

Given the reasons for whether SJB, LGIOK or GV should have been on PS an equally valid question is "Should Good Vibrations have been left off Smiley Smile in favour of George Fell Into His French Horn?"

Remember the Poo?

 LOL

It made number two in the charts.
Logged
37!ws
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1511


All baggudo at my man


View Profile WWW
« Reply #43 on: September 11, 2013, 08:34:17 AM »

My two cents:

1) "Sloop John B." absolutely belong[s/ed] on Pet Sounds, on many dimensions.

2) This topic comes up a LOT in Beach Boys discussions, yet do we ever see "Does 'Good Vibrations' belong on Smiley Smile?" debates.
Logged

Check out my podcasts: Tune X Podcast (tunex.fab4it.com) and Autobiography of a Schnook (SchnookPodcast.com); there are worse things you can do!
chrs_mrgn
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 422



View Profile
« Reply #44 on: September 11, 2013, 09:06:29 AM »

If Good Vibrations had not been on smiley smile it would have sold even less than it did. So in that regard it was probably smart to have on the album. But it really does stick out like a sore thumb.
Logged
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5143


I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: September 11, 2013, 09:11:30 AM »

2) This topic comes up a LOT in Beach Boys discussions, yet do we ever see "Does 'Good Vibrations' belong on Smiley Smile?" debates.

Not really, it belongs on Smile. When I think of Smiey, I almost forget it's even on the album, in a way. I usually skip it when I want to listen to that album. It's not on a *totally* separate train of thought musically, but to me it's somehow totally cemented in the sessions for the album that didn't happen. These are the words of someone who got into the band decades after 1967, though.

However, the single mix/edit of "Heroes", somehow, does not sound especially out of place to me and I can't imagine the album without it. No idea why, maybe it gets a pass by being the first song on the album.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2013, 09:15:34 AM by ¸ » Logged

Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
Iron Horse-Apples
Guest
« Reply #46 on: September 11, 2013, 09:17:12 AM »

Heroes fits onto Smiley 'cos huge chunks of it were recorded during the Smiley sessions. It has the heavy Baldwin overdubs, and the same earthy mix as the rest of the tracks.
Good Vibrations doesn't bother me that much, bit like Good Time on Love You. I'd miss it were it not there.

                                                                                   .............I love this album soooo much.................
Logged
Wirestone
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6063



View Profile
« Reply #47 on: September 11, 2013, 09:55:04 AM »

The lyrics fit perfectly.

The longing for home, which comes up on several tracks.

The "worst trip I've ever been on" adds a knowing wink to the intimations of altered consciousness on IKTAA.

The deep feelings of grief and longing -- "I feel so broke up." Again, reflected throughout the album.

It's never struck me that SJB was even out of place.
Logged
filledeplage
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 3151


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: September 11, 2013, 10:53:51 AM »

If Good Vibrations had not been on smiley smile it would have sold even less than it did. So in that regard it was probably smart to have on the album. But it really does stick out like a sore thumb.
GV on Smiley was about a year after the single.  A lot of the newer work was abandoning the hedonism themes, and embracing the more intellectual, abstract, and a different belief system of mysticism, more reflective in nature, around a more sophisticated music texture.  Single tracks on the various earlier albums, sort of prefigured what was evolving for the BB's. 

That song was an "anchor" as well as Heroes, as Sloop was to Pet Sounds.  Sloop is what I'd characteristic as "joyous wailing" whether it is homesickness or "mal du pays" in a very concrete, non-abstract melancholy tone, which ultimately is uplifting, as a result of the snappy time signature, and everyone gets that song. 

Development from concrete, hedonistic themes, to adult, abstract, even scholarly work is part of working towards one's full human potential.  You can sing and market songs like I Get Around, etc., but people yearn to do more with their minds, and use early work as a building block.

I'm delighted that they used Sloop on Pet Sounds, even as a teaching tool, of the folk music model.  I liken it to "Drive My Car" on Rubber Soul. Does it fit? I don't know; but it is a great opener for the album, which is sort of like WIBN or Sloop, I think.  It opens the door to listen to the rest.   Wink

Logged
gfx
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.358 seconds with 21 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!