gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
683260 Posts in 27763 Topics by 4096 Members - Latest Member: MrSunshine July 29, 2025, 07:39:29 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: The Two-Fers: 1990 versions versus 2001 versions  (Read 6866 times)
adam78
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 94


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 10, 2012, 01:53:18 PM »

Awesome dialogue people! Thank you for taking the time to clear up and inform us on these important details. Loving reading through.

Logged
PhilCohen
Guest
« Reply #26 on: January 15, 2012, 03:04:08 PM »

Yeah, the 1990 ones are no-noised a bit, while the 2001 ones are EQ'd. Of the two-fers I'd go with the 1990 ones if only for the lack of harshness; the best way to hear the 1960s albums is actually the Pastmasters series. No EQ, straight from the master tapes.
T.R.B.B.

The Pastmaster series -- is that the Japanese Toshiba series?


Yeah, with unsteady azimuth on "Do You Wanna Dance".
Logged
I. Spaceman
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2271

Revolution Never Again


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2012, 10:21:48 AM »


Yeah, with Unsteady Azimuth on "Do You Wanna Dance".

One of my favorite blues singers! Had no idea he guested with The Beach Boys.
Logged

Nobody gives a sh*t about the Record Room
gfx
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 5.279 seconds with 21 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!