gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
683834 Posts in 27791 Topics by 4100 Members - Latest Member: bunny505 September 21, 2025, 06:52:45 AM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Has anyone from Brian's old inner circle commented on BWPS  (Read 7516 times)
Mr. Wilson
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1138


Surfs up around these parts.!


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: October 04, 2009, 09:33:18 AM »

Lets go away for awhile so we can have world peace.!
Logged
PongHit
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1085


AVOID MISSING BALL FOR HIGH SCORE • JeffWinner.com


View Profile WWW
« Reply #26 on: October 04, 2009, 10:37:53 AM »

try doing some goddam research

Did I miss some drama?  What's the deal with the hostility directed toward Nobody?  OK, so some peeps might think he's a little weird, but he clearly knows & loves the BB recordings, & he says some interesting stuff.  If someone doesn't like a topic, it's easy to ignore it — why bother responding to scold him??

Isn't trolling a deliberate attempt to create an argument, without on-topic content?  I don't find Nobody's posts to be disruptive here, in fact I generally like most of them.  I do, however, find the bickering disruptive — I'm here to think/discuss BBoys — I'm not interested in the politics of the board.

I don't know Nobody, but I welcome anyone who posts with enthusiasm & makes this a richer community, & I think Nobody qualifies.

And Clay, did you really need to take the lord's name in vein?  I read this thread on a Sunday no less!  If you really think Nobody is a troll, don't feed him.
Logged

''Only more damage can arise from this temporary, fleeting image of success known as The Beach Boys.''
—MURRY WILSON

''People are thinking Mike Love is crazy.''
—MIKE LOVE

''Mike Love? He's Crazy.''
—BRIAN WILSON
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #27 on: October 04, 2009, 10:51:33 AM »

And Clay, did you really need to take the lord's name in vein?  I read this thread on a Sunday no less!  If you really think Nobody is a troll, don't feed him.

I come here to read and debate the music of Brian Wilson & The Beach Boys - not to have someone's beliefs and personal dislikes imposed on me. There was recently an exodus from the PSML (myself included) precisely because of this.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
PongHit
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1085


AVOID MISSING BALL FOR HIGH SCORE • JeffWinner.com


View Profile WWW
« Reply #28 on: October 04, 2009, 11:17:20 AM »

I come here to read and debate the music of Brian Wilson & The Beach Boys

Me too.
 
Quote
not to have someone's beliefs and personal dislikes imposed on me.

I'm not following you...  someone is imposing their opinions on you?  You mean Nobody?  Maybe I'm confused by what you're saying here, but how can we debate without expressing our beliefs?
« Last Edit: October 04, 2009, 11:25:32 AM by PongHit » Logged

''Only more damage can arise from this temporary, fleeting image of success known as The Beach Boys.''
—MURRY WILSON

''People are thinking Mike Love is crazy.''
—MIKE LOVE

''Mike Love? He's Crazy.''
—BRIAN WILSON
Compost
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 197



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: October 04, 2009, 11:46:47 AM »

Quote
nobody:  problem with liking girls in those years is that you will get stuck with them as they expand and wrinkle

every pretty girl is just saggy tits and wrinkled skin waiting to happen anyway, and a space filler for a coffin

Pure dreck.  Nuff sed.

A more appropriate thread would ask whether or not Brian has commented on  'Looking Back With Love' and if it has influenced him in anyway, e.g., increased drug use as therapy.
Logged
RickD
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 121



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: October 04, 2009, 03:12:28 PM »

Other people are entitled to post any threads they want and nobody is forced to respond.

no he's not - that is the problem - he does.

I think he meant nobody as in no one, not "nobody" the poster.



thanks for that! Wink

« Last Edit: October 04, 2009, 03:13:24 PM by RickD » Logged
nobody
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 237


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: October 04, 2009, 03:37:57 PM »

Quote
nobody:  problem with liking girls in those years is that you will get stuck with them as they expand and wrinkle

every pretty girl is just saggy tits and wrinkled skin waiting to happen anyway, and a space filler for a coffin

Pure dreck.  Nuff sed.


One man's pure dreck is another's timeless wisdom.  Wink
Logged
Magic Transistor Radio
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2974


Bill Cooper Mystery Babylon


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: October 04, 2009, 05:13:50 PM »

It's time for some of you to drink some of Brian's peace solution that he tested on his dog back in 1970.

By the way, is somebody going to answer Nobody's original question? I would like some answers damn it! Ok Magic Transistor Radio. Breathe...breathe...
Logged

"Over the years, I've been accused of not supporting our new music from this era (67-73) and just wanting to play our hits. That's complete b.s......I was also, as the front man, the one promoting these songs onstage and have the scars to show for it."
Mike Love autobiography (pg 242-243)
Sam_BFC
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1080


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: October 05, 2009, 06:04:36 AM »

I think I remember reading at some point in the last couple of years of Marylin's views on BWPS.  She was a special guest at one of the conventions and responded that the real SMiLE will always be that of the 60s or words to that effect if I remember right.
Logged

"..be cautious, don't get your hopes up, look over your shoulder because heartbreak and darkness are always ready to pounce"

petsoundsnola
Julia
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 333



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: September 04, 2025, 08:22:48 AM »

Honestly, I've been doing a deep dive on all things SMiLE and was wondering about this too. I know Diane said BWPS was "a revision" but what did Al, Marilyn, Anderle, Vosse, Siegal and Hutton honestly think? If anyone talks about it at all, it's always in the context of how cathartic the live show was, or how nice for Brian, but does anyone really listen to BWPS on a regular basis? Can anyone honestly say they'd rather bust it out when TSS is right there? That's what I want to know--do these guys really think this was the best way to "finish" it? (I know they're almost all dead now, but if they said anything before they died I would've liked to know.)

It's disappointing that this thread was such a needless shitshow but I guess that's SmileySmile sometimes.

To the person who said BWPS is seen as a novelty, not the definitive final word on SMiLE...you're right. And truthfully, that's not an unreasonable position to come to--it's exactly how most people feel outside the most hardcore protective Brian fans, I'd say. BWPS is nice and was good for Brian, but the sequence they went with has some serious problems and I think most people "sense" that even if they can't put it into words (or are too polite to try). Not to mention that nothing can ever beat the Boys/Crew in their primes, nor the warmth of analog recording.
Logged
BJL
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: September 06, 2025, 02:50:38 AM »

Honestly, I've been doing a deep dive on all things SMiLE and was wondering about this too. I know Diane said BWPS was "a revision" but what did Al, Marilyn, Anderle, Vosse, Siegal and Hutton honestly think? If anyone talks about it at all, it's always in the context of how cathartic the live show was, or how nice for Brian, but does anyone really listen to BWPS on a regular basis? Can anyone honestly say they'd rather bust it out when TSS is right there? That's what I want to know--do these guys really think this was the best way to "finish" it? (I know they're almost all dead now, but if they said anything before they died I would've liked to know.)

It's disappointing that this thread was such a needless shitshow but I guess that's SmileySmile sometimes.

To the person who said BWPS is seen as a novelty, not the definitive final word on SMiLE...you're right. And truthfully, that's not an unreasonable position to come to--it's exactly how most people feel outside the most hardcore protective Brian fans, I'd say. BWPS is nice and was good for Brian, but the sequence they went with has some serious problems and I think most people "sense" that even if they can't put it into words (or are too polite to try). Not to mention that nothing can ever beat the Boys/Crew in their primes, nor the warmth of analog recording.

I think definitive final word on Smile makes no sense, but I think novelty also makes no sense. It's an important part of the story.

I almost never return to the album itself, but I've watch the live DVD on and off fairly regularly over the past 20 years. I think the key to making sense of Brian Wilson Presents Smile is that, at least if I understand the timeline correctly, it was really designed to be a live show first, and an album only secondarily. But while the idea that it's the "real" or "true" Smile doesn't really make much sense, it is an absolutely essential part of the story and the bigger picture of the music.

Also, it played a huge role in getting Brian active and working in the studio, and as someone who also listens to Lucky Old Sun, the Gershwin record, the 2012 Beach Boys album, and No Pier Pressure fairly regularly, it's a central piece of the overall story of Brian's solo career, too. None of which takes away from the original tapes or the original project or what Brian was trying to do in 66 and 67. But is way more important, to me at least, than the word novelty makes it sound.
Logged
Julia
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 333



View Profile
« Reply #36 on: September 06, 2025, 04:30:24 AM »


I think definitive final word on Smile makes no sense, but I think novelty also makes no sense. It's an important part of the story.

I almost never return to the album itself, but I've watch the live DVD on and off fairly regularly over the past 20 years. I think the key to making sense of Brian Wilson Presents Smile is that, at least if I understand the timeline correctly, it was really designed to be a live show first, and an album only secondarily. But while the idea that it's the "real" or "true" Smile doesn't really make much sense, it is an absolutely essential part of the story and the bigger picture of the music.

Right, it's an unattainable ideal--a platonic theory of forms SMiLE. And yet... it's really not so impossible to reverse-engineer a "Platonic Dumb Angel," with the most plausible sequence from Oct-Nov '66, from when Brian was laboring under the impression that there would only be one SMiLE single, GV. (Which is an overlooked but crucial detail.) I say this would probably be something like: A1: (Prayer) Do You Like Worms A2: I'm in Great Shape [IWBA/Workshop/IIGS proper, ending with tape explosion] A3: Heroes and Villains (Barnyard fades) A4: My Only Sunshine A5: Cabin Essence A6: Wonderful  B1: Good Vibrations B2: Wind Chimes B3: Child is Father of the Man B4: I Ran B5: The Elements [Fire/Water Chant/Breathing/VeggiesDemo] B6: Surf's Up.

Along the same lines, we might then imagine a similar "Platonic SMiLE," representing Dec-Jan, when the album wasn't dead yet--VDP was still there--but after Anderle tells Brian they need a new single to launch BRI, which changes everything: A1: (You're Welcome) Heroes and Villains A2: Do You Like Worms? A3: Cabin Essence A4: Mrs. O'Leary's Cow A5: Barnyard Suite [IWBA/WS/IIGS/BY] A6: Vega-Tables (w/ fight)  B1: Good Vibrations B2: Wonderful B3: Wind Chimes B4: Child is Father of the Man B5: Second Day (I know it wasn't recorded yet, but some kind of watery/airy melody based on the abandoned CIFOTM stuff) B6: Surf's Up (Prayer). I know they're more similar than not--I'm very convinced I've cracked the code of what SMiLE '67 would've been generally, a few quibbles about bumping a track up or down one or two places, or perhaps juggling VT/GV/Wonderful between the sides notwithstanding.

You're correct it was originally done as a live project, then it got such acclaim (well deserved) they decided to make an album. In my personal opinion, all other petty misgivings aside, I think they should've just done a live album of their best performance or stitched together best performances (very SMiLE esque, that) and called it a day. If they were going to make a studio album, they should've taken the time to do it right--what are the best real instruments we got, the country's best players, recreate the Spector Wall of Sound techniques, run through each sequence 60 times if you have to to get it right, down to telling the accordion player he should back up a centimeter and face slightly to the right. If they weren't willing, why bother? If you're gonna settle when you KNOW this material can be done better, what's the point? Just give us the live, which sounds better anyway, has more energy and synergy, where little "imperfections" are part of the story of that particular performance, and call it a day. It's like that Shegiru Miyamoto quote about how a delayed game eventually comes out and THAT is what people have to remember, not the extra wait at the time. Meanwhile, a bad game is bad forever, and that's all anyone will talk about whenever it comes up.

Quote
Also, it played a huge role in getting Brian active and working in the studio, and as someone who also listens to Lucky Old Sun, the Gershwin record, the 2012 Beach Boys album, and No Pier Pressure fairly regularly, it's a central piece of the overall story of Brian's solo career, too. None of which takes away from the original tapes or the original project or what Brian was trying to do in 66 and 67. But is way more important, to me at least, than the word novelty makes it sound.

I agree with all of that and I'm grateful for those records too--highlights of his solo career. By all accounts Melinda helped him get comfortable with the music again and overcoming that artistic hangup which is fantastic. I hope my pedanticism on BWPS' relationship to the greater "Pan-SMiLE" saga is never mistaken for antagonism for the project in a vacuum. It's like how I love Smiley Smile on its own terms, and even as a lens through which to understand where Brian's head was at in Summer '67, but if someone where to argue it's what Brian intended all along in Autumn '66, that's when I push up my glasses and bust out an exhaustively worded letter to conjecture them into submission.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2025, 05:52:40 AM by Julia » Logged
gfx
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.6 seconds with 21 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!